Severe DRESS with myocarditis secondary to naproxen/esomeprazole.

A man in his 60s presented with a widespread erythematous rash and associated chills, paraesthesia and haematuria. He had recently commenced naproxen/esomeprazole. Blood tests showed hypereosinophilia (0.73×109/L) and moderate acute kidney injury. Histology revealed parakeratosis, mild spongiosis with eosinophils. He developed acute coronary syndrome with rapid atrial fibrillation. Coronary angiogram was non-obstructive. Cardiac MRI (CMR) revealed acute myocarditis secondary to Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS). Naproxen/esomeprazole was discontinued, and he was supported with oral corticosteroids. A repeat CMR 3 months later showed resolution of myocarditis. Naproxen/esomeprazole is not a common offending drug. DRESS is a rare drug-induced hypersensitivity reaction with a mortality rate of 10%. The objective of this case report is to highlight the significant but rare cardiac complications that can ensue from DRESS, which warrant prompt recognition and withdrawal of the causative drug.

Pharmacogenetic Analysis of an 8-Year Old Girl with Reye Syndrome Associated with Use of Naproxen.

BACKGROUND Reye syndrome is a rare, yet potentially life-threatening disease characterized by acute encephalopathy and hepatic failure. This report presents the case of an 8-year-old girl with Reye syndrome and seizures after the use of naproxen. CASE REPORT An 8-year-old girl experienced a 3-day episode of fever and abdominal pain. After receiving naproxen (375 mg twice daily) starting from day -3, she exhibited hypotension, tonic seizure, and loss of consciousness (day 1). Physical examination and laboratory test results revealed acute kidney injury, metabolic acidosis, and elevated levels of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), liver enzymes, and ferritin. On day 2, the maximum values of aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, LDH, creatinine, and ferritin were 955 U/L, 132 U/L, 8040 U/L, 2 mg/dL, and >40000 ug/L, respectively. She was given supportive care and recovered after 11 days (day 12), with normalization of kidney function and metabolic abnormalities. To identify possible genetic polymorphisms associated with the patient's symptoms, genotypes were tested using a drug metabolizing enzymes and transporters (DMET) gene chip. Among genes involved in the metabolism of naproxen, UGT1A6 (*1/*2) and UGT2B7 (*1/*2) resulted in possibly decreased function. Other results which may have had clinical significance included homozygote results for NAT2*6/*6 (rs1799930). CONCLUSIONS A rare case of Reye syndrome after administration of naproxen was presented in this case. A DMET gene chip was used to screen for possible genetic polymorphisms associated with Reye syndrome, but the result was inconclusive.

Patients with naproxen-induced liver injury display T-cell memory responses toward an oxidative (S)-O-desmethyl naproxen metabolite but not the acyl glucuronide.

BACKGROUND: Exposure to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) such as ibuprofen (IBU) and naproxen (NAP) is associated with idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (DILI). Carboxylate bioactivation into reactive metabolites (e.g., acyl glucuronides, AG) and resulting T-cell activation is hypothesized as causal for this adverse event. However, conclusive evidence supporting this is lacking. METHODS: In this work, we identify CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell hepatic infiltration in a biopsy from an IBU DILI patient. Lymphocyte transformation test and IFN-γ ELIspot, conducted on peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) of patients with NAP-DILI, were used to explore drug-specific T-cell activation. T-cell clones (TCC) were generated and tested for drug specificity, phenotype/function, and pathways of T-cell activation. Cells were exposed to NAP, its oxidative metabolite 6-O-desmethyl NAP (DM-NAP), its AG or synthesized NAP-AG human-serum albumin adducts (NAP-AG adduct). RESULTS: CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells from patients expressing a range of different Vß receptors were stimulated to proliferate and secrete IFN-γ and IL-22 when exposed to DM-NAP, but not NAP, NAP-AG or the NAP-AG adduct. Activation of the CD4+ TCC was HLA-DQ-restricted and dependent on antigen presenting cells (APC); most TCC were activated with DM-NAP-pulsed APC, while fixation of APC blocked the T-cell response. Cross-reactivity was not observed with structurally-related drugs. CONCLUSION: Our results confirm hepatic T-cell infiltrations in NSAID-induced DILI, and show a T-cell memory response toward DM-NAP indicating an immune-mediated basis for the adverse event. Whilst bioactivation at the carboxylate group is widely hypothesized to be pathogenic for NSAID associated DILI, we found no evidence of this with NAP.

Different Patterns of Response in Hypersensitivity Reactions to Arylpropionic Acid Derivatives.

BACKGROUND: Ibuprofen and other arylpropionic acid derivatives (APs) are among the most consumed nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs worldwide at all age ranges; however, little is known about drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) they induce. OBJECTIVE: To characterize in detail patients reporting DHRs to APs. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated patients with symptoms suggestive of AP-DHRs and analyzed their clinical characteristics, reported reactions, and diagnostic approaches. RESULTS: Six hundred sixty-two patients confirmed as hypersensitive to APs were included: 489 with cross-reactive reactions (CRs) (73.86%) and 173 with selective reactions (SRs) (26.13%). The percentage of subjects reporting reactions to ibuprofen and dexketoprofen was higher in CRs (P = .005 and P = .01, respectively), whereas naproxen and ketoprofen were more frequently involved in SRs (P = .0002 and P = .00001, respectively). The most frequent symptoms induced by ibuprofen, dexketoprofen, and naproxen were isolated angioedema and urticaria, combined or not with angioedema in both CRs and SRs. The result of nasal provocation test with lysine acetylsalicylate was positive in 156 cases (77.14% in patients showing exclusively respiratory symptoms, and in 68.18% of those with both cutaneous and respiratory involvement). To confirm diagnosis, drug provocation test with acetylsalicylic acid was required in 246 CR patients (50.3%), whereas in 28 SR patients (16.18%) drug provocation test with the culprit AP was required. CONCLUSIONS: Skin is the organ most commonly involved in AP-DHRs, with ibuprofen and dexketoprofen inducing most frequently CRs, and naproxen and ketoprofen SRs. More studies are necessary to clarify the underlying mechanism in DHRs induced by APs.

Cardiovascular risks of continuing vs. initiating NSAIDs after first-time myocardial infarction or heart failure: a nationwide cohort study.

AIMS: It is unknown whether the cardiovascular risks associated with the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) shortly after first-time myocardial infarction (MI) or heart failure (HF) differ between patients continuing and initiating use. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using nationwide health registries, we conducted a cohort study of all patients with first-time MI or HF during 1996-2018 (n = 273 682). NSAID users (n = 97 966) were categorized as continuing (17%) and initiating (83%) users according to prescription fillings < 60 days before index diagnosis. The primary outcome was a composite of new MI, HF admission, and all-cause death. Follow-up started 30 days after the index discharge date. We used Cox regression to compute hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing NSAID users vs. non-users. The most commonly filled NSAIDs were ibuprofen (50%), diclofenac (20%), etodolac (8.5%), and naproxen (4.3%). The composite outcome HR of 1.25 (CI: 1.23-1.27) was driven by initiators (HR = 1.39, 1.36-1.41) and not continuing users (HR = 1.03, 1.00-1.07). The lack of association among continuing users was also observed for individual NSAIDs (ibuprofen and naproxen), except diclofenac (HR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.05-1.18). Among initiators, the HR was 1.63 (CI: 1.57-1.69) for diclofenac, 1.31 (CI: 1.27-1.35) for ibuprofen, and 1.19 (CI: 1.08-1.31) for naproxen. The results were consistent for both MI and HF patients, the individual components of the composite outcome, and various sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: NSAID initiators were more susceptible to adverse cardiovascular outcomes after first-time MI or HF than continuing users.

Impact of hemoglobin A1c level on the association between non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use and cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes: A population-based cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) should be used cautiously in patients with type 2 diabetes. We examined whether the cardiovascular risks associated with NSAID use depended on HbA1c level in patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: We conducted a population-based cohort study of all adult Danes with a first-time HbA1c measurement ≥48 mmol/mol during 2012-2020 (n = 103 308). We used information on sex, age, comorbidity burden, and drug use to calculate time-varying inverse probability of treatment weights. After applying these weights in a pooled logistic regression, we estimated hazard ratios (HRs) of the association between use of NSAIDs (ibuprofen, naproxen, or diclofenac) and cardiovascular events (a composite of myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation or flutter, and all-cause death). We stratified all analyses by HbA1c level (<53 or ≥53 mmol/mol). RESULTS: For ibuprofen use, the HR of a cardiovascular event was 1.53 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.34-1.75) in patients with HbA1c <53 and 1.24 (95% CI: 1.00-1.53) in patients with HbA1c ≥53 mmol/mol. For naproxen use, the HR was 1.14 (95% CI: 0.59-2.21) in patients with HbA1c <53 and 1.30 (95% CI: 0.49-3.49) in patients with HbA1c ≥53 mmol/mol. For diclofenac use, the HR was 2.40 (95% CI: 1.62-3.56) in patients with HbA1c <53 and 2.89 (95% CI: 1.65-5.04) in patients with HbA1c ≥53 mmol/mol. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with type 2 diabetes, glycemic dysregulation did not affect the cardiovascular risk associated with NSAID use.

Impact of Lifestyle and Socioeconomic Position on the Association Between Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drug Use and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events: A Case-Crossover Study.

INTRODUCTION: It is unknown whether the cardiovascular risks associated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) use differ according to lifestyle and socioeconomic position. OBJECTIVE: We examined the association between NSAID use and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) within subgroups defined by lifestyle and socioeconomic position. METHODS: We conducted a case-crossover study of all adult first-time respondents to the Danish National Health Surveys of 2010, 2013, or 2017, without previous cardiovascular disease, who experienced a MACE from survey completion through 2020. We used a Mantel-Haenszel method to obtain odds ratios (ORs) of the association between NSAID use (ibuprofen, naproxen, or diclofenac) and MACE (myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, heart failure, or all-cause death). We identified NSAID use and MACE via nationwide Danish health registries. We stratified the analyses by body mass index, smoking status, alcohol consumption, physical activity level, marital status, education, income, and employment. RESULTS: Compared with non-use, the OR of MACE was 1.34 (95% confidence interval: 1.23-1.46) for ibuprofen, 1.48 (1.04-2.43) for naproxen, and 2.18 (1.72-2.78) for diclofenac. When comparing NSAID use with non-use or the individual NSAIDs with each other, we observed no notable heterogeneity in the ORs within subgroups of lifestyle and socioeconomic position for any NSAID. Compared with ibuprofen, diclofenac was associated with increased risk of MACE in several subgroups with high cardiovascular risk, e.g., individuals with overweight (OR 1.52, 1.01-2.39) and smokers (OR 1.54, 0.96-2.46). CONCLUSIONS: The relative increase in cardiovascular risk associated with NSAID use was not modified by lifestyle or socioeconomic position.

Use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in renal transplant patients: A retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Renal transplants are often prescribed non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for analgesic purposes. OBJECTIVE: Considering the dearth of data, we carried out the present study to evaluate the use of various NSAIDs and the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) in transplant patients. METHODS: A retrospective study amongst renal transplant patients prescribed at least one dose of NSAID was carried between January and December 2020 at the Department of Nephrology, Salmaniya Medical Complex, Kingdom of Bahrain. The patients' demographic details, serum creatinine values, and drug-related details were obtained. The Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria were used for defining AKI. RESULTS: Eighty-seven patients were included. Forty-three patients were prescribed diclofenac, 60 received ibuprofen, six received indomethacin, 10 were administered mefenamic acid, and 11 received naproxen. Due to multiple courses of NSAID prescription, a total of 70 prescriptions were identified for diclofenac, 80 for ibuprofen, six for indomethacin, 11 for mefenamic acid, and 16 for naproxen. No significant differences were observed in the absolute (p = 0.08) and percent changes in serum creatinine (p = 0.1) between the NSAIDs. Twenty-eight (15.2%) courses of NSAID therapy met the KDIGO criteria for AKI. Age (OR: 1.1, 95% CI: 1.007, 1.2; p = 0.02), concomitant everolimus (OR: 483, 95% CI: 4.3, 54407; p = 0.01), and mycophenolate + cyclosporine + azathioprine (OR: 63.4E+006, 95% CI: 203.2157 to 19.8E+012; p = 0.005) administration were observed with significant risk of NSAID-induced AKI. CONCLUSION: We observed possible NSAID-induced AKI to an extent of around 15.2% in our renal transplant patients. No significant differences were observed in the incidence of AKI between various NSAIDs and none of them had either graft failure or death.

Interactions of Nonsteroidal Antiinflammatory Drugs and Aspirin and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease in Patients With Osteoarthritis.

Nonsteroidal antiinf lammatory drugs (NSAIDs) remain the mainstay of the pharmacologic management for relieving osteoarthritis pain, and low-dose aspirin is often prescribed to osteoarthritis patients who are at high risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). We conducted cohort studies using data from The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database (2000-2019) to assess whether the relationship of initiation of naproxen or ibuprofen vs. initiation of other NSAIDs (excluding both naproxen and ibuprofen), respectively, to the risk of CVD was modified by coprescription of low-dose aspirin among the participants with osteoarthritis. Among participants without coprescription of aspirin, the risk of CVD was lower in naproxen initiators (10.3/1000 person-years) than in other NSAIDs initiators (13.2/1000 person-years; hazard ratio = 0.71, 95% confidence interval: 0.60, 0.85). Among participants with coprescription of aspirin, however, the risk of CVD was higher among naproxen initiators (36.9/1000 person-years) than that among other NSAIDs initiators (34.8/1000 person-years; hazard ratio = 1.48, 95% confidence interval: 1.12, 1.84). The association was significantly modified by coprescription of aspirin (P < 0.001). Similar findings were observed in the association of initiation of ibuprofen vs. other NSAIDs with the risk of CVD, which was significantly modified by coprescription of aspirin (P < 0.001). These findings suggest that osteoarthritis patients and clinicians should be aware of the potential CVD risk of concurrently taking naproxen or ibuprofen and low-dose aspirin.

Predictive value of gastrointestinal symptoms and patient risk factors for NSAID-associated gastrointestinal ulcers defined by endoscopy? Insights from a pooled analysis of two naproxen clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used to treat pain and rheumatic conditions. To facilitate patient management, we determined the predictive value of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms and risk factors for the development of NSAID-associated GI injuries. METHODS: Post-hoc analysis of pooled data from naproxen treatment arms of two identical, randomized, double-blind, controlled phase 3 trials in arthritis patients at risk of GI adverse events. Endoscopic incidence of GI ulcers at baseline, and 1, 3, and 6 months was employed as a surrogate parameter for GI injury. For GI symptom analysis, Severity of Dyspepsia Assessment questionnaire was used. For GI risk factor analysis, the high risk factors: previous GI injury, concomitant selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors or corticosteroids, ulcer history, concomitant low-dose aspirin, and age >65 years were employed. RESULTS: Data of 426 naproxen patients were analyzed. Distribution of GI symptoms between patients with and without ulcer was similar; about one third of patients developing an ulcer reported no GI pain symptoms. GI symptoms experienced under naproxen treatment were thus not indicative of GI injury. The proportion of patients developing an ulcer increased with the number of risk factors present, however, about a quarter of patients without any of the analyzed risk factors still developed an ulcer. CONCLUSION: GI symptoms and the number of risk factors are not reliable predictors of NSAID-induced GI injury to decide which patients need gastroprotection and will lead to a large group of patients with GI injuries. A preventive rather than reactive approach should be taken.

An Observational Study of Fixed Drug Eruption in A Tertiary Care Hospital in Bangladesh.

Fixed drug eruption (FDE) is a distinctive pattern of cutaneous adverse drug reaction. Characteristically the eruption recurs at the same site on re exposure to the offending agent. Aim of this study was to evaluate and identification of the various offending drugs causing FDE which may help the physician to limit the associate complication regarding the drug. This observational cross sectional study was conducted from 1st June 2021 to 31st May 2022 in the department of Dermatology & Venereology of Mymensingh Medical College Hospital after taking approval from institutional ethical committee. A detailed history with clinical evaluation were done for all patients with FDE and thereby recorded in a pre designed proforma. Analysis of data was done using Microsoft Excel 2010 Spread sheet. Out of 65 cases 36(55.38%) were male and 29(44.6%) were female. Majority of cases were found in the age group of 31 to 40 years. The most common group of drug causing FDE was NSAID (52.31%) followed by antimicrobials (44.61%) and anti epileptics (3.07%). Ibuprofen (20.0%) was the most common offending drug followed by doxycycline (18.46%), diclofenac and fluconazole (13.84%), naproxen (9.23%), ciprofloxacin (7.69%), paracetamol (6.15%), metronidazole (4.61%), carbamazepine (3.07%) and aspirin (3.07%) respectively. Extremities (43.07%) were the most frequently involved site followed by trunk (29.23%) and face (10.77%). Generalized FDE found in 16.92% cases. Although FDE are very common the offending drugs show some regional variation as a result of changing trends of pharmacotherapy.

Clinician's dilemma: Naproxen-induced liver injury.

Naproxen is a widely used nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) in pediatric population, used for mild-to-moderate pains, arthritis, and other immune-mediated disorders. It rarely causes clinically apparent liver injury in the adult population taking high doses of the drug over a prolonged period and is reported even rarer in pediatric population. We present a case of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) in a 13-year-old girl taking naproxen in therapeutic doses for juvenile rheumatoid arthritis. There was a complete recovery of liver function following discontinuation of naproxen therapy.

Repurposing some of the Well-known Non-steroid Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) for Cancer Treatment.

Drug repurposing is a strategy used to develop new treatments based on approved or investigational drugs outside the scope of their original clinical indication. Since this approach benefits from the original toxicity data of the repurposed drugs, the drug-repurposing strategy is timesaving, and inexpensive. It has a higher success rate compared to traditional drug discovery. Several repurposing candidates have been identified in silico screening and in vitro methodologies. One of the best examples is non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Tumor-promoting inflammation is one of the hallmarks of cancer, revealing a connection between inflammatory processes and tumor progression and development. This explains why using NSAIDs in the context of neoplasia has become a topic of interest. Indeed, identifying NSAIDs with antitumor activity has become a promising strategy for finding novel cancer treatment opportunities. Indeed, several commercial anti-inflammatory drugs, including aspirin, ibuprofen, diclofenac, celecoxib, tepoxalin and cyclovalone, naproxen, and indomethacin have presented antitumor activity, and some of them are already in clinical trials for cancer treatment. However, the benefits and complications of using NSAIDs for cancer treatment must be carefully evaluated, particularly for cancer patients with no further therapeutic options available. This review article provides insight into the drug repurposing strategy and describes some of the well-known NSAIDs that have been investigated as repurposed drugs with potential anticancer activity.

Cross-reactivity between nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in fixed drug eruption: Two unusual cases and a literature review.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are among the main causes of fixed drug eruption (FDE). Cross-sensitivity between chemically unrelated NSAIDs has been rarely described in FDE. We report herein two cases of NSAID-induced FDE confirmed by oral provocation test (OPT) with a literature review. Case 1 is a 49-year-old woman who took mefenamic, naproxen and acetaminophen for lumbago. On the second day, she noticed three erythematous plaques, located in the upper lip, chin and the right hand, which faded spontaneously, leaving residual patches. Three months later, she took mefenamic acid with reactivation of the same plaques. She received naproxen. On the same day, she exhibited a reactivation of lesions with the development of a new one. These lesions have disappeared leaving hyperpigmented sequelae. After negative patch test to naproxen, an OPT was performed with positive reaction, observed on the third day. To establish the cross-reactivity, she underwent OPTs, which gave positive results to indomethacin, ketoprofen and tiaprofenic acid. Case 2 is a 52-year-old woman who presented painful dusky-red macules, located in the right and left wrists, 24 hours after taking mefenamic acid. She described two similar events that occurred in the past with an undefined drug and piroxicam. Patch tests to lysine acetylsalicylate, mefenamic acid, piroxicam, naproxen and celecoxib were negative. OPTs to the same NSAIDs gave positive results to lysine acetylsalicylate, piroxicam and mefenamic acid. Thirteen case reports, seven case series and one retrospective analysis, including cases with confirmed cross-reactivity between NSAIDs, were reported in literature. Clinicians should be aware of such phenomenon.

Recommendations for the Use of Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs and Cardiovascular Disease Risk: Decades Later, Any New Lessons Learned?

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are among the most prescribed pharmacologic therapies worldwide due to their therapeutic analgesic efficacy and relative tolerability. In the past several decades, various cardiovascular (CV) adverse events have emerged regarding both traditional NSAIDs (tNSAIDs) and cyclo-oxygenase 2 (COX-2) selective (coxibs). This review will provide an updated report on the CV risk profile of NSAIDs, focusing on several of the larger clinical trials, meta-analyses, and registry studies. We aim to provide rheumatologists with a framework for NSAID use in the context of rheumatologic chronic pain management. Recent findings: In patients with and without CV diseases, the use of NSAIDs, both tNSAIDs and coxibs, is associated with an increased risk of adverse CV events, myocardial infarction, heart failure, and cerebrovascular events. These CV risks have increased within weeks of coxib use and higher doses of tNSAIDs. The risk of adverse CV events is heterogenous across NSAIDs; naproxen and low-dose ibuprofen appear to have lower increased CV risk among NSAIDs. A variation in CV risk is associated with multiple factors, including NSAID class, COX-2 selectivity, treatment dose and duration, and baseline patient risk. Summary: Many important questions remain regarding the safety of NSAIDs and whether the culmination of research performed could inform us whether specific patient subtypes or NSAID class may have a more favorable profile. tNSAIDs such as naproxen and low-dose ibuprofen may have a lower CV risk profile, while coxibs have a more favorable GI risk profile. In general, any NSAID can be optimized if used at the lowest effective dose for the shortest amount of time, especially among individuals with increased CV risk.

[Treatment of sleep disturbances associated with chronic non-specific low back pain: results of prospective randomized multicenter open-label clinical trial]. / Lechenie narushenii sna, svyazannykh s ostrym nespetsificheskim bolevym sindromom v poyasnichno-kresttsovom otdele spiny: rezul'taty prospektivnogo mnogotsentrovogo randomizirovannogo otkrytogo sravnitel'nogo v parallel'nykh gruppakh klinicheskogo issledovaniya.

OBJECTIVE: A comparative study of the effectiveness and safety of novel combination naproxen sodium and diphenhydramine in subjects with low back pain along with transient insomnia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: It was an open label, randomized, comparative, parallel group and multi-center clinical study. Subjects were randomised into one of three treatment arms: naproxen sodium 440 mg/diphenhydramine 50 mg, naproxen sodium 550 mg, Paracetamol 1000 mg/diphenhydramine 50 mg. All the subjects were advised to apply study drug ones before sleep for 3 days. All subjects also received naproxen sodium 275 mg as background therapy. The primary end-point was wake time after sleep onset (WASO) measured by actigraphy. Other secondary sleep and pain end-points were also assessed. RESULTS: Efficacy analysis was performed for intent-to-treat population (n=235 subjects). naproxen sodium 440 mg/diphenhydramine 50 mg combination showed significant improvements in WASO vs. naproxen sodium 550 mg (-42 min p=0.0174), while differences vs. Paracetamol 1000 mg/diphenhydramine 50 mg (-30 min, p=0.0891) were not significant. According to the average pain intensity difference in the lumbosacral spine combination product naproxen sodium 440 mg/diphenhydramine 50 mg was significantly improved compared with naproxen sodium 550 mg (-9.42, p<0.001) and Paracetamol 1000 mg/diphenhydramine 50 (-7.15, p<0.05). CONCLUSION: Naproxen sodium 440 mg/diphenhydramine 50 mg combination demonstrated improvement in sleep maintenance (WASO) vs. naproxen sodium 550 mg and higher efficiency in average daily pain reduction compared with the comparison groups. The treatment was well tolerated There were no serious or unexpected adverse events reported in the study.

Effect of a Postoperative Multimodal Opioid-Sparing Protocol vs Standard Opioid Prescribing on Postoperative Opioid Consumption After Knee or Shoulder Arthroscopy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: In arthroscopic knee and shoulder surgery, there is growing evidence that opioid-sparing protocols may reduce postoperative opioid consumption while adequately addressing patients' pain. However, there are a lack of prospective, comparative trials evaluating their effectiveness. Objective: To evaluate the effect of a multimodal, opioid-sparing approach to postoperative pain management compared with the current standard of care in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder or knee surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial was performed at 3 clinical sites in Ontario, Canada, and enrolled 200 patients from March 2021 to March 2022 with final follow-up completed in April 2022. Adult patients undergoing outpatient arthroscopic shoulder or knee surgery were followed up for 6 weeks postoperatively. Interventions: The opioid-sparing group (100 participants randomized) received a prescription of naproxen, acetaminophen (paracetamol), and pantoprazole; a limited rescue prescription of hydromorphone; and a patient educational infographic. The control group (100 participants randomized) received the current standard of care determined by the treating surgeon, which consisted of an opioid analgesic. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was postoperative oral morphine equivalent (OME) consumption at 6 weeks after surgery. There were 5 secondary outcomes, including pain, patient satisfaction, opioid refills, quantity of OMEs prescribed at the time of hospital discharge, and adverse events at 6 weeks all reported at 6 weeks after surgery. Results: Among the 200 patients who were randomized (mean age, 43 years; 73 women [38%]), 193 patients (97%) completed the trial; 98 of whom were randomized to receive standard care and 95 the opioid-sparing protocol. Patients in the opioid-sparing protocol consumed significantly fewer opioids (median, 0 mg; IQR, 0-8.0 mg) than patients in the control group (median, 40.0 mg; IQR, 7.5-105.0; z = -6.55; P < .001). Of the 5 prespecified secondary end points, 4 showed no significant difference. The mean amount of OMEs prescribed was 341.2 mg (95% CI, 310.2-372.2) in the standard care group and 40.4 mg (95% CI, 39.6-41.2) in the opioid-sparing group (mean difference, 300.8 mg; 95% CI, 269.4-332.3; P < .001). There was no significant difference in adverse events at 6 weeks (2 events [2.1%] in the standard care group vs 3 events [3.2%] in the opioid-sparing group), but more patients reported medication-related adverse effects in the standard care group (32% vs 19%, P = .048). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients who underwent arthroscopic knee or shoulder surgery, a multimodal opioid-sparing postoperative pain management protocol, compared with standard opioid prescribing, significantly reduced postoperative opioid consumption over 6 weeks. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04566250.

Medicine-Induced Acute Kidney Injury Findings from Spontaneous Reporting Systems, Sequence Symmetry Analysis and a Case-Control Study with a Focus on Medicines Used in Primary Care.

INTRODUCTION: Primary care provides an opportunity to prevent community acquired, medicine or drug-induced acute kidney injury. One of the barriers to proactive prevention of medicine-induced kidney injury in primary care is the lack of a list of nephrotoxic medicines that are most problematic in primary care, particularly one that provides a comparison of risks across medicines. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to consolidate evidence on the risks associated with medicines and acute kidney injury, with a focus on medicines used in primary care. METHOD: We searched the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases to identify published studies of all medicines associated with acute kidney injury identified from spontaneous report data. For each medicine positively associated with acute kidney injury, as identified from spontaneous reports, we implemented a sequence symmetry analysis (SSA) and a case-control design to determine the association between the medicine and hospital admission with a primary diagnosis of acute kidney injury (representing community-acquired acute kidney injury). Administrative claims data held by the Australian Government Department of Veterans' Affairs for the study period 2005-2019 were used. RESULTS: We identified 89 medicines suspected of causing acute kidney injury based on spontaneous report data and a reporting odds ratio above 2, from Japan, France and the US. Spironolactone had risk estimates of 3 or more based on spontaneous reports, SSA and case-control methods, while furosemide and trimethoprim with sulfamethoxazole had risk estimates of 1.5 or more. Positive association with SSA and spontaneous reports, but not case control, showed zoledronic acid had risk estimates above 2, while candesartan telmisartan, simvastatin, naproxen and ibuprofen all had risk estimates in SSA between 1.5 and 2. Positive associations with case-control and spontaneous reports, but not SSA, were found for amphotericin B, omeprazole, metformin, amlodipine, ramipril, olmesartan, ciprofloxacin, valaciclovir, mycophenolate and diclofenac. All with the exception of metformin and omeprazole had risk estimates above 2. CONCLUSION: This research highlights a number of medicines that may contribute to acute injury; however, we had an insufficient sample to confirm associations of some medicines. Spironolactone, furosemide, and trimethoprim with sulfamethoxazole are medicines that, in particular, need to be used carefully and monitored closely in patients in the community at risk of acute kidney injury.

Comparative analysis of the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in Montenegro, Finland and Croatia in the period 2010-2019.

OBJECTIVE: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used drugs. However, numerous studies have shown that non-selective cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors can also significantly increase the risk of cardiovascular side effects. Diclofenac has the highest risk, while naproxen has the lowest risk of developing these complications. The aim of the study was to analyze the structure and amount of NSAIDs consumed in Montenegro, Finland and Croatia in the last 10 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In our study, we used 90% drug use (DU90) and ATC/DDD methodology. Drug consumption is shown in DDD/1000 inhabitants/day, and drug prices per DDD in Euros (€). Pearson's correlation test was used to examine the correlation between the number of drugs consumed and their price. RESULTS: Diclofenac consumption is 3 to 4 times higher in Montenegro compared to Croatia, and 9 to 10 times higher than in Finland. The average price of diclofenac in Montenegro was around € 0.07 per DDD, in Finland around € 0.26 per DDD and in Croatia € 0.19 per DDD. In Montenegro, the Pearson correlation test did not show a statistically significant association between high diclofenac consumption and its DDD price but showed a positive strong correlation between DDD price growth and naproxen consumption growth. CONCLUSIONS: The situation in Montenegro regarding the consumption of diclofenac is unfavorable and it is necessary to change the attitude and awareness of doctors and patients about the use of diclofenac. It is also necessary to replace diclofenac with naproxen, which is a slightly more expensive but safer drug.

Pharmacokinetic Interactions Between Tegoprazan and Naproxen, Aceclofenac, and Celecoxib in Healthy Korean Male Subjects.

PURPOSE: Tegoprazan is a potassium-competitive acid blocker used for gastric acid suppression and may be used with NSAIDs to reduce gastrointestinal adverse effects. The aim of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetic interaction between tegoprazan and commonly used NSAIDS, namely, naproxen, aceclofenac, and celecoxib. METHODS: An open-label, 3-cohort, randomized, multiple-dose, 3-way crossover study was conducted in healthy male subjects. In cohort 1, tegoprazan (50-mg tablet, once daily) and naproxen (500-mg tablet, twice daily) were administered separately or concurrently for 7 days in each period. In cohort 2, tegoprazan and aceclofenac (100-mg tablet, twice daily) were administered separately or concurrently for 7 days in each period. In cohort 3, tegoprazan and celecoxib (200-mg capsule, twice daily) were administered separately or concurrently for 7 days in each period. Pharmacokinetic blood samples were collected up to 24 hours after the last dose. FINDINGS: Seventeen subjects from cohort 1, sixteen subjects from cohort 2, and thirteen subjects from cohort 3 were included in the pharmacokinetic analysis. In cohort 1, the geometric least squares mean ratios (90% CIs) for AUCτ (AUC profiles over the dosing interval) and Css,max (Cmax at steady state) were 1.01 (0.91-1.12) and 0.99 (0.83-1.17) for tegoprazan, and 1.00 (0.97-1.03) and 1.04 (0.99-1.09) for naproxen, respectively. The values in cohort 2 were 1.03 (0.93-1.13) and 0.94 (0.86-1.04) for tegoprazan, and 1.06 (1.00-1.12) and 1.31 (1.08-1.60) for aceclofenac. The values in cohort 3 were 1.01 (0.86-1.18) and 1.02 (0.87-1.19) for tegoprazan, and 1.08 (0.96-1.22) and 1.18 (0.97-1.43) for celecoxib. IMPLICATIONS: Changes in the maximum aceclofenac or celecoxib concentrations were detected after concurrent administration with tegoprazan, which were considered mainly due to the pharmacodynamic effect of tegoprazan. Because systemic drug exposure (shown as AUCτ) was unchanged after concurrent administration of any 3 NSAIDs with tegoprazan, the increase in aceclofenac or celecoxib Css,max when administered with tegoprazan would not be clinically significant in practice. CLINICALTRIALS: gov Identifier: NCT04639804.